🔗 Share this article

Mainstream parties in power are more and more allowing the radical right to set the public discourse, as per a new study carried out in Germany.

Researchers found that this phenomenon has inadvertently benefited far-right parties by legitimising their ideas and spreading them more widely.

Study Based on Over 20 Years of News Coverage

The results, released in the European Journal of Political Research, utilized an automated text analysis of more than 520,000 articles from six national publications.

Capital-based researchers observed that as the radical faction moved from fringe issues in the 1990s era to core subjects like assimilation and immigration, mainstream political groups progressively adapted their communication in response.

This adjustment amplified the dissemination of these ideas and indicated to voters that such stances were acceptable.

Implications for Democratic Systems

"Public communication by established parties plays a central role in the electoral success of the radical right," explained a expert in political behavior participating in the research.

"This factor has been overlooked," she noted.

The impact was evident even when mainstream groups were condemning the far right. "You're still giving them attention," the expert remarked. "The main point is that because we live in such a battle for attention, this focus is key."

Normalisation Effect Across the Continent

While the study was centered around Germany, this mainstreaming phenomenon is probable to apply to countries throughout the European continent.

"You see this a lot in German and British news outlets," explained another co-author. "Radical groups makes a statement and everyone begins discussing it for several days."

"Although you're opposing it, you're repeating it," he stated.

Toughening of Political Discourse

At times, leaders have also hardened their discourse to align with that of the far right.

In a recently published discussion, a then German chancellor advocated large-scale expulsions and urged them to happen "more frequently and rapidly."

Comparable instances can be observed across the continent, as elected officials from nations ranging from the United Kingdom to the French Republic adopt the rhetoric of the radical right, particularly on migration.

This has formed an echo chamber that would have been inconceivable a decade ago.

Central Issue: Who Sets the Agenda?

"{If you're a moderate party and you are talking about societal topics – migration, integration – in a way that is determined by the rhythm of the far right, that's the whole idea of narrative control," clarified a researcher.

Some political parties have taken additional measures, attempting to emulate the strict agenda of the far right, despite studies suggests that this approach leads the electorate to vote for the radical faction.

Gradual Impact and Public Perception

The scope of information gathered revealed that the influence of far-right parties had been gradual and had increased with the passage of time.

"Voter awareness doesn't change from day to day," commented a researcher. "However, when you hear this negative framing around immigration frequently, and it is being disseminated not only by radical groups but also, for instance, by mainstream political organizations, then of course this narrative gains more traction."

Requirement for Mainstream Groups to Carve Out Their Own Narratives

The study emphasized the need for mainstream political parties to develop their own narratives, especially on subjects such as migration and integration, instead of continuously trailing after the radical right.

"It's like a dance," explained one researcher. "When the leader is far-right and you're responding to them, you cannot decide which music should be heard."